Overview

DIVISION OF MEDIA TECHNOLOGY AND INTERACTION DESIGN

Row

Publications in DiVA 2020
(fractional counts)

38.8

WoS coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

45.3 %

Scopus coverage 2014 - 2020
(peer reviewed)

82.1 %

Row

Notes more…

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Overall Web of Science coverage for peer reviewed publications in this unit is poor, 45.3%.

Note that the coverage numbers for Web of Science and Scopus apply to publications in the KTH bibliometric database Bibmet. If a WoS-id or Scoupus-id from DiVA can not be matched in Bibmet, it does not count as covered.

Row

Background

The bibliometric indicators referred are based on publications registered in DiVA. Only publications from currently employed researchers at KTH are included. The rolling nature of this report means that it provides more of a current overview and less of a historic stable trend, since it excludes publications written by researchers that are no longer affiliated to KTH, but have been at some point in time.

Indicators in the Citation impact, Journal impact and Co‑publishing tabs are based on Web of Science publications only. Corresponding Scopus indicators can be found under the Scopus tab.

Row

Researchers at the unit

Publication data is available only after login.

Publications in DiVA

DIVISION OF MEDIA TECHNOLOGY AND INTERACTION DESIGN

Row

Fractional count

Publication volume, fractionalized

Publication volume, fractionalized

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 6.7 8.3 7.8 7.2 6.0 11.9 10.2 58.2 55.6% 0.8
Article, other 0.3 1.0 NA NA 0.7 1.3 0.9 4.3 49.4% 0.8
Conference paper, peer review 17.4 13.3 16.0 10.1 13.5 17.9 22.7 111.0 39.9% 0.8
Conference paper, other 4.2 3.4 1.0 2.1 2.6 1.8 4.1 19.2 1.3% 0.1
Book NA NA 1.0 0.2 1.0 NA NA 2.2 0.0% 0.0
Anthology (editor) 1.0 NA NA 0.5 NA NA NA 1.5 0.0% 0.0
Chapter in book 0.7 3.8 2.0 3.7 4.0 1.0 0.9 16.0 0.0% 0.2
Proceeding (editor) 1.0 NA 0.5 NA NA NA NA 1.5 0.0% 0.0
Report NA NA NA NA NA 1.0 NA 1.0 0.0% 0.0
Doctoral thesis NA NA NA NA 1.0 2.0 NA 3.0 0.0% 0.0
Licentiate thesis NA 1.0 1.0 NA NA NA NA 2.0 0.0% 0.0

Full count

Publication volume, full count

Publication volume, full count

DiVA publication type 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Publications WoS coverage Scopus coverage
Article, peer review 22 24 18 18 20 33 25 160 60.6% 1
Article, other 2 2 NA NA 2 2 2 10 60.0% 1
Conference paper, peer review 48 32 40 23 41 41 46 271 42.8% 1
Conference paper, other 8 6 4 6 6 4 8 42 2.4% 0
Book NA NA 1 1 1 NA NA 3 0.0% 0
Anthology (editor) 1 NA NA 1 NA NA NA 2 0.0% 0
Chapter in book 2 5 2 5 6 1 3 24 0.0% 0
Proceeding (editor) 1 NA 1 NA NA NA NA 2 0.0% 0
Report NA NA NA NA NA 2 NA 2 0.0% 0
Doctoral thesis NA NA NA NA 1 2 NA 3 0.0% 0
Licentiate thesis NA 1 1 NA NA NA NA 2 0.0% 0

Row

Publication volume

Publication volume

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Web of Science coverage by publication type

Citation impact

DIVISION OF MEDIA TECHNOLOGY AND INTERACTION DESIGN

Row

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Citations 3-year window, fractional counts

Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 9.9 15.9 1.6 4.6 46.6%
2015 9.9 25.7 2.6 5.1 52.0%
2016 12.3 34.2 2.8 6.3 51.4%
2017 9.8 34.1 3.5 1.6 16.5%
2018 13.0 58.1 4.5 4.2 32.3%
Total 54.8 168.0 3.1 21.9 39.8%

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Field normalized citations, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Cf Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 11.0 0.97 1.0 8.9%
2015-2017 11.8 0.88 1.2 10.1%
2016-2018 13.2 1.04 1.7 12.7%
2017-2019 15.9 1.04 1.7 10.8%
Total 26.9 1.01 2.7 10.0%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article, Proceedings paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 21 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 39.7%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 48.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Average field normalized citations (Cf)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal impact

DIVISION OF MEDIA TECHNOLOGY AND INTERACTION DESIGN

Row

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)

Publication years Publications Average Journal Cf Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 11.0 1.23 1.9 17.3%
2015-2017 11.8 1.18 2.8 23.9%
2016-2018 13.2 1.23 4.3 32.5%
2017-2019 15.9 1.14 4.3 27.3%
2018-2020 16.5 1.20 4.2 25.7%
Total 32.3 1.21 7.5 23.1%

Row

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 48.1%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

Row

Field normalized journal impact (JCf)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

DIVISION OF MEDIA TECHNOLOGY AND INTERACTION DESIGN

Row

Summary

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

International and Swedish non-university co‑publications (full counts)

Publication years Publications Swedish non-university co-publications Share Swedish non-university International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 36 5 13.9% 17 47.2%
2015-2017 32 2 6.2% 17 53.1%
2016-2018 36 2 5.6% 21 58.3%
2017-2019 44 4 9.1% 28 63.6%
2018-2020 50 4 8.0% 36 72.0%
Total 97 9 9.3% 60 61.9%

Notes more…

This table is based on Web of Science publication types Article and Review.
Rows are based on at least 32 (full counted) publications with poor Web of Science coverage (at least 53.3%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable

International and Swedish non-university co‑publication

Countries and organizations

Co‑publication countries

Co‑publication countries

Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
China 35 34 1 0 0 8.4
United Kingdom 30 26 4 0 0 8.0
United States 23 20 3 0 0 5.1
Denmark 8 7 1 0 0 2.4
Germany 9 8 1 0 0 2.0
Israel 5 5 0 0 0 1.6
Iceland 5 5 0 0 0 1.4
Finland 6 6 0 0 0 1.4
Italy 5 5 0 0 0 1.4
Canada 6 5 1 0 0 1.2
Austria 3 3 0 0 0 1.2
Netherlands 4 4 0 0 0 1.1
Spain 4 2 2 0 0 0.9
Switzerland 4 3 1 0 0 0.8
Ireland 3 2 1 0 0 0.8
Japan 3 2 1 0 0 0.8
Norway 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
France 3 2 1 0 0 0.5
Australia 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Tanzania 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Brazil 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Palestine 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Portugal 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Turkey 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
New Zealand 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
Lebanon 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
India 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Iraq 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
United Arab Emirates 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Ecuador 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Mexico 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Belgium 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Co‑publication organizations

Co‑publication countries

Organization Organization type Country Publications 1-10 auth 11-50 auth 51-200 auth Over 200 auth Publications (frac)
Umeå University University Sweden 37 36 1 0 0 10.3
RISE - Research Institutes of Sweden Institute Sweden 13 13 0 0 0 5.0
Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications University China 25 24 1 0 0 4.9
Uppsala University University Sweden 11 11 0 0 0 3.3
China Academy of Art University College China 5 5 0 0 0 2.5
Lancaster University University United Kingdom 6 4 2 0 0 2.4
Newcastle University University United Kingdom 11 11 0 0 0 2.2
Stockholm University University Sweden 6 6 0 0 0 1.7
Reykjavík University University Iceland 5 5 0 0 0 1.4
Karolinska Institutet University Sweden 7 7 0 0 0 1.4
Stanford University University United States 4 4 0 0 0 1.3
Luleå University of Technology University Sweden 5 5 0 0 0 1.3
University of York University United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 1.2
Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology University China 6 5 1 0 0 1.2
Örebro University University Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 1.2
University of Northumbria at Newcastle University United Kingdom 5 4 1 0 0 1.1
Linköping University University Sweden 4 4 0 0 0 1.0
Palestine Polytechnic University (PPU) University Israel 3 3 0 0 0 1.0
ABB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 1.0
Royal College of Music in Stockholm University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 1.0
The Royal Institution Other Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 1.0
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences University Sweden 5 5 0 0 0 0.9
Swedish Defence Research Agency Institute Sweden 3 3 0 0 0 0.9
NANJING UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY University China 4 4 0 0 0 0.8
Open University University United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
Vienna University of Technology University Austria 2 2 0 0 0 0.8
Georgia Institute of Technology University United States 4 3 1 0 0 0.8
ETH Zurich University Switzerland 3 3 0 0 0 0.8
University of Copenhagen University Denmark 2 1 1 0 0 0.8
University of Genoa University Italy 1 1 0 0 0 0.8
Eindhoven University of Technology University Netherlands 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
IT University of Copenhagen University Denmark 3 3 0 0 0 0.7
University of Tsukuba University Japan 2 2 0 0 0 0.7
Chinese Academy of Sciences Institute China 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
University of California, Irvine University United States 4 2 2 0 0 0.6
Aalto University University Finland 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
Trinity College, Dublin University Ireland 2 1 1 0 0 0.6
Södertörns University College University College Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.6
Simon Fraser University University Canada 3 2 1 0 0 0.6
Nanjing Audit University University China 3 3 0 0 0 0.6
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology University Israel 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Aalborg University University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
FIVAN Other health services Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
International Computer Science Institute (ICSI) Institute United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Karlstad University University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Lund University University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
Southeast University University China 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
University of Glasgow University United Kingdom 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Zeb Consulting Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
NA NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.5
University of Bergen University Norway 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
University of Gothenburg University Sweden 2 2 0 0 0 0.5
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology University China 3 3 0 0 0 0.5
Ericsson Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.4
inUse AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.4
University College London University United Kingdom 2 1 1 0 0 0.4
University of Dar Es Salaam University Tanzania 2 2 0 0 0 0.4
Bielefeld University University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
City, University of London University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Heilbronn University of Applied Sciences University College Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
IEEE Institute United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Malmö University College University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
McGill University University Canada 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Queen Mary University of London University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Technical University of Berlin University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
Telecom Italia Company Italy 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
University of Arizona University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
University of California, Los Angeles University United States 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
University of Eastern Finland University Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Manitoba University Canada 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
University of Maryland, Baltimore University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Music and Performing Arts Vienna University Austria 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Sydney University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.3
University of Trento University Italy 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Paul Sabatier University University France 2 1 1 0 0 0.3
Wuhan University University China 2 2 0 0 0 0.3
Aarhus University University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Bauhaus University, Weimar University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Bogazici University University Turkey 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Central South University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
HONG KONG BAPTIST UNIVERSITY University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Indiana University Bloomington University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Institute for Humane Technology (IHT) Other Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Jaume I University University Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Lanzhou Jiaotong University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Leeds Teaching Hosp NHS Trust NA United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Mälardalen University College University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO) Other Public Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Ningbo University of Technology University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Palestine Polytechnic University (PPU) University Palestine 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Pennsylvania State University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Plux Wireless Biosignals NA Portugal 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Qingdao University University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Silverline Memories Other United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Technical University of Cologne University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University College West University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Arts, Crafts and Design University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Lapland University Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
UNL Univ Nova Lisboa University Portugal 1 0 1 0 0 0.2
Zhejiang University of Technology University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of California, Davis University United States 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
University of Leicester University United Kingdom 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
American University of Beirut University Lebanon 2 2 0 0 0 0.2
University of Southern California University United States 2 1 1 0 0 0.2
Indian Institutes of Technology University India 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
IT Univ Kobenhavn University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Newcastle Upon Tyne Hosp NHS Trust NA United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro University Brazil 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Purdue University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University College Cork University Ireland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Baghdad (UOB) University Iraq 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Lincoln University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Nice Sophia Antipolis University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Southern Denmark University Denmark 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Toulouse University France 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
VTT Technical Research Centre Institute Finland 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Arjuna Technologies Limited Company United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Ateljé Andrejs Ljunggren (AAL) Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
BORIS Design Studio NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Boris Design Studio Ltd Company China 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Carleton College University College United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Chalmers University of Technology University Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Columbia University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Harvard University University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Japan Science and Technology Agency Other Public Japan 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Kanulf, Gabriel Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Max Planck Society for the Advancement of Science (MPG) Institute Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
Mozilla Other United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University College of Art, Craft and Design University College Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Connecticut University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of East London (UEL) University United Kingdom 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Siegen University Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
University of Washington University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
NA NA United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.2
California State University, Long Beach (CSULB) University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
New York University Abu Dhabi (NYUAD) University United Arab Emirates 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China University China 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Urbio AB Company Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Victoria University Wellington University New Zealand 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Westmont College University College United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Delft University of Technology University Netherlands 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (Harvard School of Public Health) University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
AI Sustainabil Ctr NA Sweden 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
BC3 NA Spain 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB) Institute Germany 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology University United States 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Monash University University Australia 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
University of Otago University New Zealand 1 1 0 0 0 0.1
Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL) University Ecuador 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Northwestern University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
NTT Commun Sci Labs NA Japan 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Univ Colima University Mexico 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Univ Fed Mato Grosso University Brazil 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Central Florida University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Tokyo University Japan 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Canterbury Christ Church University (CCCU) University United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Cedarwood Trust Other United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Cent South Univ NA China 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology University Germany 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Institute United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Playing Out Company United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Tsinghua University University China 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Cornell University University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Polytechnic University of Catalonia (UPC) University Spain 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
Rolls-Royce Holdings plc Company United Kingdom 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Kansas University United States 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Namur University Belgium 1 0 1 0 0 0.1
University of Zurich University Switzerland 1 0 1 0 0 0.1

Open Access

DIVISION OF MEDIA TECHNOLOGY AND INTERACTION DESIGN

Row

Open Access publications, full counts

Open Access publications, full counts

Publication Year Publications Open Access publications OA gold OA hybrid OA green OA bronze Not OA Share OA
2014 56 17 6 0 9 2 39 30.4%
2015 43 20 6 1 11 2 23 46.5%
2016 48 25 4 0 18 3 23 52.1%
2017 33 12 4 1 5 2 21 36.4%
2018 51 30 6 3 11 10 21 58.8%
2019 55 31 8 3 10 10 24 56.4%
2020 65 34 9 4 9 12 31 52.3%
Total 351 169 43 12 73 41 182 48.1%

Row

Notes more…

The Open Access type of the publications was fetched from the Unpaywall REST API. The method to determine the OA type is presented here.

In summary, the different OA types can be described as follows:

  • Gold: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is fully OA.

  • Hybrid: The full text has been found on a publisher website, in a journal that is not fully OA.

  • Green: The full text has been found in an institutional repository, such as DiVA.

  • Bronze: The full text has been found on a publisher website but no OA license could be identified.

N.B.: This table is based on peer-reviewed publications for which Unpaywall could determine the OA type (necessary condition: have a DOI number). Unpaywall’s method is empirical and does not strictly equate to copyright license. As a consequence, the OA status of a given publication may vary with time — for example turning from “Not OA” to “Green” when a full text is added to DiVA.

Row

Overview of Open Access publications - piechart

Stacked area chart for publications

Scopus

DIVISION OF MEDIA TECHNOLOGY AND INTERACTION DESIGN

Row

Citation Impact

Column

Citations, open window
Citations, open window
Publication Year Publications Total Citations Average Citations Uncited publications Share uncited
2014 17.9 168.4 9.4 4.1 23.0%
2015 16.3 198.9 12.2 2.4 14.6%
2016 18.7 152.5 8.2 3.8 20.3%
2017 16.4 114.5 7.0 1.9 11.5%
2018 17.2 200.4 11.7 2.8 16.4%
2019 26.0 100.2 3.9 6.7 25.8%
2020 29.5 51.5 1.7 16.5 55.7%
Total 142.0 986.4 6.9 38.1 26.9%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Conference Paper, Review, Letter and Editorial.
Rows are based on at least 37 (full counted) publications with moderate Scopus coverage (at least 72.9%).
(DiVA publication types Article, peer review and Conference paper, peer review)
Indicators based on < 50 publications are considered unreliable
Average field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Field weighted citation impact (FWCI)
Publication years Publications Average FWCI Top 10% publications Share Top 10%
2014-2016 47.6 1.06 5.5 11.5%
2015-2017 48.4 1.05 5.5 11.4%
2016-2018 49.7 1.38 6.4 12.9%
2017-2019 55.1 1.48 8.6 15.6%
Total 102.7 1.29 14.1 13.7%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 125 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 73.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

Share of publications among Top 10% cited

Journal Impact

Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Journal impact, fractionalized (3-year moving average)
Publication years Publications Average SNIP Publications in Top 20% journals Share Top 20% journals
2014-2016 31.8 1.23 14.4 45.3%
2015-2017 34.2 1.23 16.3 47.6%
2016-2018 36.4 1.27 19.3 52.8%
2017-2019 40.8 1.27 23.4 57.3%
2018-2020 48.4 1.08 19.9 41.2%
Total 90.9 1.17 41.3 45.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 125 (full counted) publications with moderate Web of Science coverage (at least 73.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)
Field normalized journal impact (SNIP)

Share of publications in Top 20% journals

Co‑publishing

International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
International and corporate co‑publications (full counts)
Publication years Publications Corporate co-publications Share corporate International co-publications Share international
2014-2016 144 18 12.5% 65 45.1%
2015-2017 129 13 10.1% 64 49.6%
2016-2018 140 16 11.4% 77 55.0%
2017-2019 152 13 8.6% 85 55.9%
2018-2020 182 14 7.7% 105 57.7%
Total 364 34 9.3% 191 52.5%
Notes more…

This table is based on Scopus publication types Article, Review and Conference Paper.
Rows are based on at least 129 (full counted) publications with good Web of Science coverage (at least 76.6%).
(DiVA publication type Article, peer review)

International and corporate co‑publication

About

Row